2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고1 외고1
외고1
외고1
제목 없음
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
제목 없음
UNIT 03 Confirmation Bias: Seeing Only What You Want to See Confirmation Bias refers to the pervasive tendency for individuals to favor information that supports their preexisting beliefs while disregarding or minimizing evidence that contradicts them. First identified in psychological experiments during the 1960s, this bias remains one of the most influential distortions of human reasoning. At its core, Confirmation Bias arises from the desire for cognitive consistency. People naturally prefer harmony between their beliefs and the information they encounter, even if that harmony comes at the expense of accuracy. Consequently, they selectively notice, remember, and interpret evidence in ways that reaffirm what they already believe. The bias is particularly evident in politics. Voters interpret the same speech or policy through the lens of partisan loyalty: supporters perceive wisdom, while opponents detect deception. In such cases, perception is less about objective truth and more about reinforcing identity and group affiliation. Confirmation Bias also operates in science and business. Researchers may unconsciously design experiments that favor their hypotheses, and managers may prioritize data that validates strategic decisions while ignoring inconvenient findings. This dynamic can lead to costly errors, stalled innovation, and misplaced confidence. Digital technologies amplify the bias further. Personalized algorithms on social media curate content that aligns with prior preferences, creating echo chambers in which dissenting voices are rarely heard. As individuals are surrounded by confirming evidence, they grow more entrenched in their views and increasingly resistant to change. Mitigating Confirmation Bias requires deliberate effort. Critical thinking, exposure to diverse perspectives, and institutional safeguards-such as peer review-help counterbalance the human tendency to seek comfort in agreement.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 UNIT 03 Confirmation Bias: Seeing Only What You Want to See Confirmation Bias refers to the pervasive tendency for individuals to favor information that supports their preexisting beliefs while disregarding or minimizing evidence that contradicts them. 2 First identified in psychological experiments during the 1960s, this bias remains one of the most influential distortions of human reasoning. 3 At its core, Confirmation Bias arises from the desire for cognitive consistency. 4 People naturally prefer harmony between their beliefs and the information they encounter, even if that harmony comes at the expense of accuracy. 5 Consequently, they selectively notice, remember, and interpret evidence in ways that reaffirm what they already believe. 6 The bias is particularly evident in politics. 7 Voters interpret the same speech or policy through the lens of partisan loyalty: supporters perceive wisdom, while opponents detect deception. 8 In such cases, perception is less about objective truth and more about reinforcing identity and group affiliation. 9 Confirmation Bias also operates in science and business. 10 Researchers may unconsciously design experiments that favor their hypotheses, and managers may prioritize data that validates strategic decisions while ignoring inconvenient findings. 11 This dynamic can lead to costly errors, stalled innovation, and misplaced confidence. 12 Digital technologies amplify the bias further. 13 Personalized algorithms on social media curate content that aligns with prior preferences, creating echo chambers in which dissenting voices are rarely heard. 14 As individuals are surrounded by confirming evidence, they grow more entrenched in their views and increasingly resistant to change. 15 Mitigating Confirmation Bias requires deliberate effort. 16 Critical thinking, exposure to diverse perspectives, and institutional safeguards-such as peer review-help counterbalance the human tendency to seek comfort in agreement.