2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
충남외고1 기말 / 공통영어 외부지문 충남외고1 기말 / 공통영어 외부지문
충남외고1 기말 / 공통영어 외부지문
충남외고1 기말 / 공통영어 외부지문
Media Issues
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
Media Issues
As global warming has emerged as an item of media and public interest, more Earth scientists are entering the public arena, which in many instances is not an area for which he or she has particular affinity. Individual scientists were never trained and for which he or she has no particular affinity. Perhaps partly as a result, many statements attributed to scientists that appear in the media lack scientific objectivity. Some of these are misquotes or quotes taken out of context, for instance by eliminating caveats that the scientist carefully explained but that the interviewer felt unnecessarily confused the issue. In some such cases, the misquoted scientist can become quite frustrated by the process and quite uninclined to speak with the media again. On the other hand, in other instances, statements lacking scientific objectivity are correctly quoted and are indeed the fault of the scientists. Like everyone else, scientists can make mistakes. These can arise because of the scientist's being outright wrong, for such reasons as being overly nervous, being overly desirous not to disappoint an interviewer by discussing caveats and ambiguities, or, most disturbing, wanting too much to make an attention-grabbing statement. Meanwhile, quite a few stories have been overhyped in a way that successfully gets immediate attention but in the long run impairs the public's confidence in the science and in the press. One way to avoid contributing to overhyping a story would be to say nothing. However, that is not a realistic option for scientists who feel a strong sense of responsibility to the public and policymakers and/or to offer suggestions. Speaking with members of the media has advantages in getting a message out and perhaps receiving favorable recognition, but it runs the risk of misinterpretations, the need for repeated clarifications, and entanglement in never-ending controversy. Hence, the decision of whether to speak with the media tends to be highly individualized.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 As global warming has emerged as an item of media and public interest, more Earth scientists are entering the public arena, which in many instances is not an area for which he or she has particular affinity. 2 Individual scientists were never trained and for which he or she has no particular affinity. 3 Perhaps partly as a result, many statements attributed to scientists that appear in the media lack scientific objectivity. 4 Some of these are misquotes or quotes taken out of context, for instance by eliminating caveats that the scientist carefully explained but that the interviewer felt unnecessarily confused the issue. 5 In some such cases, the misquoted scientist can become quite frustrated by the process and quite uninclined to speak with the media again. 6 On the other hand, in other instances, statements lacking scientific objectivity are correctly quoted and are indeed the fault of the scientists. 7 Like everyone else, scientists can make mistakes. 8 These can arise because of the scientist's being outright wrong, for such reasons as being overly nervous, being overly desirous not to disappoint an interviewer by discussing caveats and ambiguities, or, most disturbing, wanting too much to make an attention-grabbing statement. 9 Meanwhile, quite a few stories have been overhyped in a way that successfully gets immediate attention but in the long run impairs the public's confidence in the science and in the press. 10 One way to avoid contributing to overhyping a story would be to say nothing. 11 However, that is not a realistic option for scientists who feel a strong sense of responsibility to the public and policymakers and/or to offer suggestions. 12 Speaking with members of the media has advantages in getting a message out and perhaps receiving favorable recognition, but it runs the risk of misinterpretations, the need for repeated clarifications, and entanglement in never-ending controversy. 13 Hence, the decision of whether to speak with the media tends to be highly individualized.