2024. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
EBS 수능완성 영어(2025 수능대비) 실전편 2권
EBS 수능완성 영어(2025 수능대비) 실전편 2권
EBS 수능완성 영어(2025 수능대비) 실전편 2권
41~42.
print
지문 전체 문장
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
41~42.
A proper understanding of the relationship between the historical and the scientific is important for progress in the social and biological sciences. There is (or ought to be) an intimate interplay between the study of the unique events of given historical sequences and the generalizations about process constructed by studying many cases in a comparative and comprehensive framework. The study of unique cases furnishes the data from which generalizations are derived, while the generalizations allow us to understand better the processes that operated on particular historical trajectories. We cannot neglect the close, critical study of particular cases without putting the database for generalization in jeopardy. Besides, we often have legitimate reasons to be curious about exactly how particular historical sequences, such as the evolution of Homo sapiens, occurred. On the other hand, it is from the study of many cases that we form a body of theory about evolutionary processes. No one historical trajectory contains enough information to obtain a very good grasp of the processes that affected its own evolution. Data are missing because the record is imperfect. The lineage may be extinct, and so direct observation is impossible. Even if the lineage is in existence, experimentation may be impossible for practical or ethical reasons. Potential causal variables may be correlated in particular cases, so understanding their behavior may be impossible. The comparative method can often clarify such cases. "Scientists" need "historians" and "historians" need "scientists" as well.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 A proper understanding of the relationship between the historical and the scientific is important for progress in the social and biological sciences. 2 There is (or ought to be) an intimate interplay between the study of the unique events of given historical sequences and the generalizations about process constructed by studying many cases in a comparative and comprehensive framework. 3 The study of unique cases furnishes the data from which generalizations are derived, while the generalizations allow us to understand better the processes that operated on particular historical trajectories. 4 We cannot neglect the close, critical study of particular cases without putting the database for generalization in jeopardy. 5 Besides, we often have legitimate reasons to be curious about exactly how particular historical sequences, such as the evolution of Homo sapiens, occurred. 6 On the other hand, it is from the study of many cases that we form a body of theory about evolutionary processes. 7 No one historical trajectory contains enough information to obtain a very good grasp of the processes that affected its own evolution. 8 Data are missing because the record is imperfect. 9 The lineage may be extinct, and so direct observation is impossible. 10 Even if the lineage is in existence, experimentation may be impossible for practical or ethical reasons. 11 Potential causal variables may be correlated in particular cases, so understanding their behavior may be impossible. 12 The comparative method can often clarify such cases. 13 "Scientists" need "historians" and "historians" need "scientists" as well.