2024. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
[2023년 10월] 모의고사 (고3)
[2023년 10월] 모의고사 (고3)
[2023년 10월] 모의고사 (고3)
41~42.
print
지문 전체 문장
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
41~42.
The domination of nature is a familiar trope in environmental ethics and environmental political theory. Its history is tied more broadly to the rise of modern science, philosophy, and politics. The effort to understand the causal relations that govern the physical world so as to intervene in these relations in ways that could, as Francis Bacon put it, "ameliorate the human condition," marked the beginning of modernity in the West. For a long time, the "domination of nature" referred to this effort to understand and control the nonhuman environment, and it was seen as a clearly good thing. This effort made possible new technologies and rising economic prosperity, promised an end to many forms of human suffering, and demonstrated the triumph of reason over ignorance and superstition. Its costs began to be visible with industrialization in the nineteenth century, which generated obvious environmental damage and caused among many people a sense of alienation from the land and the more-than-human communities composing it. One sees a growing unease about these costs in novels of the era such as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), in poems like Wordsworth's "Michael" (1800) and later Whitman's Leaves of Grass (1855), and in the early nature writing of Thoreau's Walden (1854). Yet systematic, critical analysis of the domination of nature as a problem came into its own only with the environmental studies movement in the 1970s. Since then, the trope has come to have a broadly negative meaning, with the domination of nature being viewed as harmful and illegitimate, as well as dangerous to human interests.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 The domination of nature is a familiar trope in environmental ethics and environmental political theory. 2 Its history is tied more broadly to the rise of modern science, philosophy, and politics. 3 The effort to understand the causal relations that govern the physical world so as to intervene in these relations in ways that could, as Francis Bacon put it, "ameliorate the human condition," marked the beginning of modernity in the West. 4 For a long time, the "domination of nature" referred to this effort to understand and control the nonhuman environment, and it was seen as a clearly good thing. 5 This effort made possible new technologies and rising economic prosperity, promised an end to many forms of human suffering, and demonstrated the triumph of reason over ignorance and superstition. 6 Its costs began to be visible with industrialization in the nineteenth century, which generated obvious environmental damage and caused among many people a sense of alienation from the land and the more-than-human communities composing it. 7 One sees a growing unease about these costs in novels of the era such as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), in poems like Wordsworth's "Michael" (1800) and later Whitman's Leaves of Grass (1855), and in the early nature writing of Thoreau's Walden (1854). 8 Yet systematic, critical analysis of the domination of nature as a problem came into its own only with the environmental studies movement in the 1970s. 9 Since then, the trope has come to have a broadly negative meaning, with the domination of nature being viewed as harmful and illegitimate, as well as dangerous to human interests.