2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
Nytimes 1109 Nytimes 1109
Nytimes 1109
Nytimes 1109
제목 없음
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
제목 없음
The Justice Department immediately challenged that ruling, but the appeals court declined on Friday to block the judge's order from taking immediate effect. The Trump administration then turned to the Supreme Court, where Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson granted a temporary pause, known as an administrative stay. The justice, who handles emergency applications from courts in that part of the country, essentially left it to the appeals court to decide what to do. That means the panel of judges must determine whether to halt or preserve the original order requiring the White House to fund SNAP benefits in full this month. A decision is expected quickly. But the result, in the meantime, was legal whiplash for the families who rely on the food stamp program, even in states that had recently announced they would begin funding benefits in full. Those include California, Michigan, New Jersey and Wisconsin, where it remained unclear by Saturday how the Supreme Court decision might immediately affect their low-income residents. Many of those states had sued the Trump administration over SNAP funding in a case still being heard in a court in Massachusetts. On Saturday, they asked a judge there to issue an order prohibiting the Agriculture Department from punishing them for their handling of benefits during the shutdown. "It is downright cruel that the Trump administration is still trying to cut off food benefits from millions of Americans," Matthew J. Platkin, the attorney general of New Jersey, a Democrat, said in a statement. He added that it was "unconscionable" that the Agriculture Department had issued conflicting guidance about payments, while promising that New Jersey would "not stop fighting to ensure that full SNAP benefits remain available to our residents."
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 The Justice Department immediately challenged that ruling, but the appeals court declined on Friday to block the judge's order from taking immediate effect. 2 The Trump administration then turned to the Supreme Court, where Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson granted a temporary pause, known as an administrative stay. 3 The justice, who handles emergency applications from courts in that part of the country, essentially left it to the appeals court to decide what to do. 4 That means the panel of judges must determine whether to halt or preserve the original order requiring the White House to fund SNAP benefits in full this month. 5 A decision is expected quickly. 6 But the result, in the meantime, was legal whiplash for the families who rely on the food stamp program, even in states that had recently announced they would begin funding benefits in full. 7 Those include California, Michigan, New Jersey and Wisconsin, where it remained unclear by Saturday how the Supreme Court decision might immediately affect their low-income residents. 8 Many of those states had sued the Trump administration over SNAP funding in a case still being heard in a court in Massachusetts. 9 On Saturday, they asked a judge there to issue an order prohibiting the Agriculture Department from punishing them for their handling of benefits during the shutdown. 10 "It is downright cruel that the Trump administration is still trying to cut off food benefits from millions of Americans," Matthew J. Platkin, the attorney general of New Jersey, a Democrat, said in a statement. 11 He added that it was "unconscionable" that the Agriculture Department had issued conflicting guidance about payments, while promising that New Jersey would "not stop fighting to ensure that full SNAP benefits remain available to our residents."