2024. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
HELLO-BOOK
HELLO-BOOK
HELLO-BOOK
print
지문 전체 문장
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
In short, they want to impose a tax when countries with looser regulations on carbon emission than the EU and the United States export products to them. Exporting companies are in a desperate situation as they would have to pay 1.2 trillion won ($1 billion) a year in border taxes to export the current volume. Carbon neutrality is not a task limited to companies and not something the government can attain by setting goals. In the end, the carbon border tax the EU and the U.S. are considering is a threat to Korea, heavily relying on free trade. Emerging economies, including Korea, have attained economic development by freely expanding into the markets of the developed world under the WTO system. It is undeniable that the carbon border tax is a new trade barrier. The European Union and the United States presented a plan to introduce a carbon border tax to prevent global warming, the main culprit of climate disasters. The EU and U.S. preoccupy the topic of green economy and want to restore the manufacturing hegemony that has been passed on to emerging economies. But the EU and the U.S. want to restore their leverage in manufacturing and change the rules of the trade game by protecting local economies. The Federation of Korean Industries sent a letter to the president of the European Commission, requesting that Korea be excluded from the application of the border tax. The superficial reason for introducing the unfamiliar concept of a carbon border tax is to respond to climate change. Companies need to change their production systems to reduce carbon emission by turning to green energy. The meteorological disasters and unusual temperatures around the world have made carbon neutrality a global task. The government also should provide various incentives and long-term policy assistance, including a reconsideration of the nuclear phase-out policy. But we cannot ignore that advanced countries want to secure additional tax revenue by imposing a new tariff with the excuse of climate change. The EU can get an additional 14 billion euros ($16.5 billion) in tax revenue by imposing a carbon border tax on steel, aluminum, fertilizer and cement from 2026. The United States also will have as much as $16 billion in additional tax revenue by imposing the carbon border tax from next year.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 In short, they want to impose a tax when countries with looser regulations on carbon emission than the EU and the United States export products to them. 2 Exporting companies are in a desperate situation as they would have to pay 1.2 trillion won ($1 billion) a year in border taxes to export the current volume. 3 Carbon neutrality is not a task limited to companies and not something the government can attain by setting goals. 4 In the end, the carbon border tax the EU and the U.S. are considering is a threat to Korea, heavily relying on free trade. 5 Emerging economies, including Korea, have attained economic development by freely expanding into the markets of the developed world under the WTO system. 6 It is undeniable that the carbon border tax is a new trade barrier. 7 The European Union and the United States presented a plan to introduce a carbon border tax to prevent global warming, the main culprit of climate disasters. 8 The EU and U.S. preoccupy the topic of green economy and want to restore the manufacturing hegemony that has been passed on to emerging economies. 9 But the EU and the U.S. want to restore their leverage in manufacturing and change the rules of the trade game by protecting local economies. 10 The Federation of Korean Industries sent a letter to the president of the European Commission, requesting that Korea be excluded from the application of the border tax. 11 The superficial reason for introducing the unfamiliar concept of a carbon border tax is to respond to climate change. 12 Companies need to change their production systems to reduce carbon emission by turning to green energy. 13 The meteorological disasters and unusual temperatures around the world have made carbon neutrality a global task. 14 The government also should provide various incentives and long-term policy assistance, including a reconsideration of the nuclear phase-out policy. 15 But we cannot ignore that advanced countries want to secure additional tax revenue by imposing a new tariff with the excuse of climate change. 16 The EU can get an additional 14 billion euros ($16.5 billion) in tax revenue by imposing a carbon border tax on steel, aluminum, fertilizer and cement from 2026. 17 The United States also will have as much as $16 billion in additional tax revenue by imposing the carbon border tax from next year.