2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_3 외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_3
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_3
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_3
11-3
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
11-3
Mill begins by pledging allegiance to the utilitarian creed: "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." "By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure." He also affirms the theory of life on which this theory of morality is grounded—namely, that pleasure and freedom from pain are the only things desirable as ends; and that all desirable things... are desirable either for pleasure inherent in themselves or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain." Despite insisting that pleasure and pain are all that matter, Mill acknowledges that "some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others." How can we know which pleasures are qualitatively higher? Mill proposes a simple test: "Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of any feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure." This test has one clear advantage: It does not depart from the utilitarian idea that morality rests wholly and simply on our actual desires. "The sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable is that people actually desire it." Mill writes. But as a way of arriving at qualitative distinctions among pleasures, his test seems open to an obvious objection: Isn't it often the case that we prefer lower pleasures to higher ones? Don't we sometimes prefer lying on the sofa watching sitcoms to reading Plato or going to the opera? And isn't it possible to prefer these undemanding experiences without considering them to be particularly worthwhile?
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 Mill begins by pledging allegiance to the utilitarian creed: "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." 2 "By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure." 3 He also affirms the theory of life on which this theory of morality is grounded—namely, that pleasure and freedom from pain are the only things desirable as ends; and that all desirable things... 4 are desirable either for pleasure inherent in themselves or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain." 5 Despite insisting that pleasure and pain are all that matter, Mill acknowledges that "some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others." 6 How can we know which pleasures are qualitatively higher? 7 Mill proposes a simple test: "Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of any feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure." 8 This test has one clear advantage: It does not depart from the utilitarian idea that morality rests wholly and simply on our actual desires. 9 "The sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable is that people actually desire it." 10 Mill writes. 11 But as a way of arriving at qualitative distinctions among pleasures, his test seems open to an obvious objection: Isn't it often the case that we prefer lower pleasures to higher ones? 12 Don't we sometimes prefer lying on the sofa watching sitcoms to reading Plato or going to the opera? 13 And isn't it possible to prefer these undemanding experiences without considering them to be particularly worthwhile?