2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과 외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
2-4
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
2-4
It is also about virtue about cultivating the attitudes and dispositions, the qualities of character, on which a good society depends. Some people, including many who support price-gouging laws, find the virtue argument discomfiting. The reason: It seems more judgmental than arguments that appeal to welfare and freedom. To ask whether a policy will speed economic recovery or spur economic growth does not involve judging people's preferences. It assumes that everyone prefers more income rather than less, and it doesn't pass judgment on how they spend their money. Similarly, to ask whether, under conditions of duress, people are actually free to choose doesn't require evaluating their choices. The question is whether, or to what extent, people are free rather than coerced. The virtue argument, by contrast, rests on a judgment that greed is a vice that the state should discourage. But who is to judge what is virtue and what is vice? Don't citizens of pluralist societies disagree about such things? And isn't it dangerous to impose judgments about virtue through law? In the face of these worries, many people hold that government should be neutral on matters of virtue and vice; it should not try to cultivate good attitudes or discourage bad ones. So when we probe our reactions to price gouging, we find ourselves pulled in two directions: We are outraged when people get things they don't deserve; greed that preys on human misery, we think, should be punished, not rewarded. And yet we worry when judgments about virtue find their way into law. This dilemma points to one of the great questions of political phi-losophy: Does a just society seek to promote the virtue of its citizens? Or should law be neutral toward competing conceptions of virtue, so that citizens can be free to choose for themselves the best way to live?
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 It is also about virtue about cultivating the attitudes and dispositions, the qualities of character, on which a good society depends. 2 Some people, including many who support price-gouging laws, find the virtue argument discomfiting. 3 The reason: It seems more judgmental than arguments that appeal to welfare and freedom. 4 To ask whether a policy will speed economic recovery or spur economic growth does not involve judging people's preferences. 5 It assumes that everyone prefers more income rather than less, and it doesn't pass judgment on how they spend their money. 6 Similarly, to ask whether, under conditions of duress, people are actually free to choose doesn't require evaluating their choices. 7 The question is whether, or to what extent, people are free rather than coerced. 8 The virtue argument, by contrast, rests on a judgment that greed is a vice that the state should discourage. 9 But who is to judge what is virtue and what is vice? 10 Don't citizens of pluralist societies disagree about such things? 11 And isn't it dangerous to impose judgments about virtue through law? 12 In the face of these worries, many people hold that government should be neutral on matters of virtue and vice; it should not try to cultivate good attitudes or discourage bad ones. 13 So when we probe our reactions to price gouging, we find ourselves pulled in two directions: We are outraged when people get things they don't deserve; greed that preys on human misery, we think, should be punished, not rewarded. 14 And yet we worry when judgments about virtue find their way into law. 15 This dilemma points to one of the great questions of political phi-losophy: Does a just society seek to promote the virtue of its citizens? 16 Or should law be neutral toward competing conceptions of virtue, so that citizens can be free to choose for themselves the best way to live?