2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과 외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
5-3
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
5-3
Finally, we turn to theories that see justice as bound up with virtue and the good life. In contemporary politics, virtue theories are often identified with cultural conservatives and the religious right. The idea of legislating morality is anathema to many citizens of liberal societies, as it risks lapsing into intolerance and coercion. But the notion that a just society affirms certain virtues and conceptions of the good life has inspired political movements and arguments across the ideological spectrum. Not only the Taliban, but also abolitionists and Martin Luther King, Jr., have drawn their visions of justice from moral and religious ideals. Before attempting to assess these theories of justice, it's worth asking how philosophical arguments can proceed-especially in so contested a domain as moral and political philosophy. They often begin with concrete situations. As we've seen in our discussion of price goug-ing, Purple Hearts, and bailouts, moral and political reflection finds its occasion in disagreement. Often the disagreements are among partisans or rival advocates in the public realm. Sometimes the disagreements are within us as individuals, as when we find ourselves torn or conflicted about a hard moral question. But how exactly can we reason our way from the judgments we make about concrete situations to the principles of justice we believe should apply in all situations? What, in short, does moral reasoning consist in? To see how moral reasoning can proceed, let's turn to two situations one a fanciful hypothetical story much discussed by philoso-phers, the other an actual story about an excruciating moral dilemma. Consider first this philosopher's hypothetical. 36 Like all such tales, it involves a scenario stripped of many realistic complexities, so that we can focus on a limited number of philosophical issues.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 Finally, we turn to theories that see justice as bound up with virtue and the good life. 2 In contemporary politics, virtue theories are often identified with cultural conservatives and the religious right. 3 The idea of legislating morality is anathema to many citizens of liberal societies, as it risks lapsing into intolerance and coercion. 4 But the notion that a just society affirms certain virtues and conceptions of the good life has inspired political movements and arguments across the ideological spectrum. 5 Not only the Taliban, but also abolitionists and Martin Luther King, Jr., have drawn their visions of justice from moral and religious ideals. 6 Before attempting to assess these theories of justice, it's worth asking how philosophical arguments can proceed-especially in so contested a domain as moral and political philosophy. 7 They often begin with concrete situations. 8 As we've seen in our discussion of price goug-ing, Purple Hearts, and bailouts, moral and political reflection finds its occasion in disagreement. 9 Often the disagreements are among partisans or rival advocates in the public realm. 10 Sometimes the disagreements are within us as individuals, as when we find ourselves torn or conflicted about a hard moral question. 11 But how exactly can we reason our way from the judgments we make about concrete situations to the principles of justice we believe should apply in all situations? 12 What, in short, does moral reasoning consist in? 13 To see how moral reasoning can proceed, let's turn to two situations one a fanciful hypothetical story much discussed by philoso-phers, the other an actual story about an excruciating moral dilemma. 14 Consider first this philosopher's hypothetical. 15 36 Like all such tales, it involves a scenario stripped of many realistic complexities, so that we can focus on a limited number of philosophical issues.