2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과 외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과
4-6
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
4-6
One obvious difference is that bailout bonuses come from the taxpayer while the bonuses paid in good times come from company earn-ings. If the outrage is based on the conviction that the bonuses are undeserved, however, the source of the payment is not morally deci-sive. But it does provide a clue: the reason the bonuses are coming from the taxpayer is that the companies have failed. This takes us to the heart of the complaint. The American public's real objection to the bonuses and the bailout—is not that they reward greed but that they reward failure. Americans are harder on failure than on greed. In market-driven societies, ambitious people are expected to pursue their interests vigorously, and the line between self-interest and greed often blurs. But the line between success and failure is etched more sharply. And the idea that people deserve the rewards that success bestows is central to the American dream. Notwithstanding his passing reference to greed, President Obama understood that rewarding failure was the deeper source of dissonance and outrage. In announcing limits on executive pay at companies receiving bailout funds, Obama identified the real source of bailout outrage: This is America. We don't disparage wealth. We don't begrudge anybody for achieving success. And we certainly believe that success should be rewarded. But what gets people upsetand rightfully so— are executives being rewarded for failure, especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. One of the most bizarre statements about bailout ethics came from Senator Charles Grassley (R-lowa), a fiscal conservative from the heartland. At the height of the bonus furor, Grassley said in an lowa radio interview that what bothered him most was the refusal of the corporate executives to take any blame for their failures.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 One obvious difference is that bailout bonuses come from the taxpayer while the bonuses paid in good times come from company earn-ings. 2 If the outrage is based on the conviction that the bonuses are undeserved, however, the source of the payment is not morally deci-sive. 3 But it does provide a clue: the reason the bonuses are coming from the taxpayer is that the companies have failed. 4 This takes us to the heart of the complaint. 5 The American public's real objection to the bonuses and the bailout—is not that they reward greed but that they reward failure. 6 Americans are harder on failure than on greed. 7 In market-driven societies, ambitious people are expected to pursue their interests vigorously, and the line between self-interest and greed often blurs. 8 But the line between success and failure is etched more sharply. 9 And the idea that people deserve the rewards that success bestows is central to the American dream. 10 Notwithstanding his passing reference to greed, President Obama understood that rewarding failure was the deeper source of dissonance and outrage. 11 In announcing limits on executive pay at companies receiving bailout funds, Obama identified the real source of bailout outrage: This is America. 12 We don't disparage wealth. 13 We don't begrudge anybody for achieving success. 14 And we certainly believe that success should be rewarded. 15 But what gets people upsetand rightfully so— are executives being rewarded for failure, especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. 16 One of the most bizarre statements about bailout ethics came from Senator Charles Grassley (R-lowa), a fiscal conservative from the heartland. 17 At the height of the bonus furor, Grassley said in an lowa radio interview that what bothered him most was the refusal of the corporate executives to take any blame for their failures.