2024. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
HELLO-BOOK
HELLO-BOOK
HELLO-BOOK
print
지문 전체 문장
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
We've been meaning to introduce for some time but haven't been able to find anyone available to teach it. I would have liked Barr to expand upon his claim that existing tenements prevented skyscrapers in certain neighbourhoods because 'likely no skyscraper developer was interested in performing the necessary "slum clearance"'. At first glance, it is not obvious why slum clearance would be limiting, while more expensive foundations would not. While less technical than the research paper on which the chapter is based, it is probably more technical than would be preferred by a general audience. It is too specialized for most readers. How do people give young people and old people advice? What are the areas in which people are more or less willing to accept advice? Chapter seven tackles the 'bedrock myth', the assumption that the absence of bedrock close to the surface between Downtown and Midtown New York is the reason for skyscrapers not being built between the two urban centers. Rather, Barr argues that while deeper bedrock does increase foundation costs, these costs were neither prohibitively high nor were they large compared to the overall cost of building a skyscraper. Barr's thorough technological history discusses not only how caissons work, but also the dangers involved. He uses data to assess the viability of these two explanations and finds that supply and demand factors explain much of the development of the 1920s; though it enabled the boom, cheap credit was not, he argues, the primary cause. The explanation that is given for the building boom is unlikely. He finds that changes in land values predict future building height, but the reverse is not true.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 We've been meaning to introduce for some time but haven't been able to find anyone available to teach it. 2 I would have liked Barr to expand upon his claim that existing tenements prevented skyscrapers in certain neighbourhoods because 'likely no skyscraper developer was interested in performing the necessary "slum clearance"'. 3 At first glance, it is not obvious why slum clearance would be limiting, while more expensive foundations would not. 4 While less technical than the research paper on which the chapter is based, it is probably more technical than would be preferred by a general audience. 5 It is too specialized for most readers. 6 How do people give young people and old people advice? 7 What are the areas in which people are more or less willing to accept advice? 8 Chapter seven tackles the 'bedrock myth', the assumption that the absence of bedrock close to the surface between Downtown and Midtown New York is the reason for skyscrapers not being built between the two urban centers. 9 Rather, Barr argues that while deeper bedrock does increase foundation costs, these costs were neither prohibitively high nor were they large compared to the overall cost of building a skyscraper. 10 Barr's thorough technological history discusses not only how caissons work, but also the dangers involved. 11 He uses data to assess the viability of these two explanations and finds that supply and demand factors explain much of the development of the 1920s; though it enabled the boom, cheap credit was not, he argues, the primary cause. 12 The explanation that is given for the building boom is unlikely. 13 He finds that changes in land values predict future building height, but the reverse is not true.