2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
25년 2학기 기말고사 리스펙 25년 2학기 기말고사 리스펙
25년 2학기 기말고사 리스펙
25년 2학기 기말고사 리스펙
56
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
56
Debates about the possibilities of copycats are routine after horrifying incidents like the gun rampage at Virginia Tech. Is media violence, people ask, responsible for violence in reality? Few disagree that long-term exposure to violent images gradually accustoms people to violence. However, whether those exposed to violent images exercise violence without variance is another question. Hence violence in the media is often rendered as an indirect, long-term factor behind a violent society, rather than as its direct cause. Fundamental reasons behind crime, such as socio-economic problems, are often obscured by a focus on the media. Many object that violence comes from a foundation of basic aggression rather than from movies, and that society should accept responsibility. Yet violent films must provide a serious answer to why they have chosen violent expression in contemporary films. Todd Gitlin, a journalism critic and sociologist, is one of the leading critics of the film director Quentin Tarantino, the godfather of violent movies. He does not agree at all with Tarantino's argument that film violence is a matter of aesthetics. Holding that Hollywood has inspired numerous mass murderers, Gitlin insists that violent films have severed the link between a rational account of crime, such as motivation or morality, and acts of meaningless violence. Viewers are thereby rarely able to muster sympathy for the victims of violence on screen. Violence, unbridled by the gravitational force of the routine, retired to the province of abstraction, becomes a meaningless set of motions. Gitlin also rejects the effects of viewed violence as catharsis, questioning why violence in reality has not yet decreased despite the astounding presence of violent films.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 Debates about the possibilities of copycats are routine after horrifying incidents like the gun rampage at Virginia Tech. 2 Is media violence, people ask, responsible for violence in reality? 3 Few disagree that long-term exposure to violent images gradually accustoms people to violence. 4 However, whether those exposed to violent images exercise violence without variance is another question. 5 Hence violence in the media is often rendered as an indirect, long-term factor behind a violent society, rather than as its direct cause. 6 Fundamental reasons behind crime, such as socio-economic problems, are often obscured by a focus on the media. 7 Many object that violence comes from a foundation of basic aggression rather than from movies, and that society should accept responsibility. 8 Yet violent films must provide a serious answer to why they have chosen violent expression in contemporary films. 9 Todd Gitlin, a journalism critic and sociologist, is one of the leading critics of the film director Quentin Tarantino, the godfather of violent movies. 10 He does not agree at all with Tarantino's argument that film violence is a matter of aesthetics. 11 Holding that Hollywood has inspired numerous mass murderers, Gitlin insists that violent films have severed the link between a rational account of crime, such as motivation or morality, and acts of meaningless violence. 12 Viewers are thereby rarely able to muster sympathy for the victims of violence on screen. 13 Violence, unbridled by the gravitational force of the routine, retired to the province of abstraction, becomes a meaningless set of motions. 14 Gitlin also rejects the effects of viewed violence as catharsis, questioning why violence in reality has not yet decreased despite the astounding presence of violent films.