2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_2 외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_2
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_2
외고2 26년 1학기 원서 1,2과_2
6-4
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
6-4
To calculate the benefits to be gained by a safer gas tank, Ford estimated that 180 deaths and 180 burn injuries would result if no changes were made. It then placed a monetary value on each life lost and injury suffered—$200,000 per life, and $67,000 per injury. It added to these amounts the number and value of the Pintos likely to go up in flames, and calculated that the overall benefit of the safety improvement would be $49.5 million. But the cost of adding an $11 device to 12.5 million vehicles would be $137.5 million. So the company concluded that the cost of fixing the fuel tank was not worth the benefits of a safer car:!? Upon learning of the study, the jury was outraged. It awarded the plaintif $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $125 million in punitive damages (an amount later reduced to $3.5 million). Perhaps the jurors considered it wrong for a corporation to assign a monetary value to human life, or perhaps they thought that $ 200,000 was egregiously low. Ford had not come up with that figure on its own, but had taken it from a U.S. government agency. In the early 1970s, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had calculated the cost of a trafic fatality. Counting future productivity losses, medical costs, funeral costs, and the victim's pain and suffering, the agency arrived at $200,000 per fatality. If the jury's objection was to the price tag, not the principle, a utilitarian could agree. Few people would choose to die in a car crash for $200,000. Most people like living. To measure the full effect on utility of a traffic fatality, one would have to include the victim's loss of future happiness, not only lost earnings and funeral costs. What, then, would be a truer estimate of the dollar value of a human life?
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 To calculate the benefits to be gained by a safer gas tank, Ford estimated that 180 deaths and 180 burn injuries would result if no changes were made. 2 It then placed a monetary value on each life lost and injury suffered—$200,000 per life, and $67,000 per injury. 3 It added to these amounts the number and value of the Pintos likely to go up in flames, and calculated that the overall benefit of the safety improvement would be $49.5 million. 4 But the cost of adding an $11 device to 12.5 million vehicles would be $137.5 million. 5 So the company concluded that the cost of fixing the fuel tank was not worth the benefits of a safer car:!? 6 Upon learning of the study, the jury was outraged. 7 It awarded the plaintif $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $125 million in punitive damages (an amount later reduced to $3.5 million). 8 Perhaps the jurors considered it wrong for a corporation to assign a monetary value to human life, or perhaps they thought that $ 200,000 was egregiously low. 9 Ford had not come up with that figure on its own, but had taken it from a U.S. government agency. 10 In the early 1970s, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had calculated the cost of a trafic fatality. 11 Counting future productivity losses, medical costs, funeral costs, and the victim's pain and suffering, the agency arrived at $200,000 per fatality. 12 If the jury's objection was to the price tag, not the principle, a utilitarian could agree. 13 Few people would choose to die in a car crash for $200,000. 14 Most people like living. 15 To measure the full effect on utility of a traffic fatality, one would have to include the victim's loss of future happiness, not only lost earnings and funeral costs. 16 What, then, would be a truer estimate of the dollar value of a human life?