2026. Reading Is An Intelligent Sport.
Our mission is to make everything about sentences.
 Please stay here and make your dreams.
지문 분석결과
fico가 지문 학습에 필요한 것들을 구성하여 학습 효율성을 제공해 드립니다.
노트나 질문을 통해 자신만의 지문 노트를 만들어 관리해 보세요.
시사영 1-17 시사영 1-17
시사영 1-17
시사영 1-17
16-1
print
문장 선택
문장을 클릭하면 해당 문장의 구문 분석 내용을 보여줍니다.
16-1
Impact of anonymity in online communities In September, a Pew poll showed that anonymous comments come from a quarter of people on the Internet. Younger people are less likely to use their names along with a comment. 40% of people between the ages of 18 and 29 do not use their names. The psychologist, John Suler, talks of the "online disinhibition effect" that disconnects a person's comments from himself, and online comments are often criticized for this. This effect is when a lack of name means a lack of constraint on what is said. Your real identity remains unknown. However, a positive outcome of anonymity is that people participate more. When the sense of community is stronger, the pressure of standing out as an individual is reduced. In addition, creativity and problem-solving skills are increased by anonymity. Ina Blau and Avner Caspi, who did research on student learning, discovered that anonymity increased participation and risk-taking while lack of anonymity improved satisfaction. Moreover, anonymity brings greater regulation. Lack of identity means that comments are more easily disregarded. A 2012 computer interaction study confirmed the findings of the past, seeing that although anonymity brought more controversial comments, these did not tend to have much effect on anyone. Michael Bernstein, a Stanford computer scientist, examined the often contentious and ill-mannered online discussion forum, 4chan, which is predominantly anonymous, and found that user interactions developed natural regulations while some commentators were, thus, considered to be of varying influence and credibility.
지문 노트목록 지문단위의 해석이나 의미 등 내용에 대한 설명입니다.
지문에 대한 질문목록 이 지문과 관련된 질문이 있다면 이곳에서 등록해 보세요. (예를들면, 이 지문과 관련된 문제 풀이가 궁금할 때)
지문에 사용된 특정 문장에 대한 궁금증은 해당 문장의 헬프fico쌤에 등록하는 것이 좋습니다.
등록된 질문이 없습니다.
fico 문장 분석
이 지문에 대해 AI는 다음과 같은 문장들로 구분하였습니다.
문장 구분과 분석의 정확성을 높이려면 'fico 정확성을 높이려면'을 참고하세요
list_alt해석 목록
여러 AI의 해석들을 제공해 드립니다.
inventory_2단어 목록 ● 단어 목록에 OpenVocas로 등록된 구가 있습니다.
문장에서 등장하는 단어를 fico가 대신 검색하여 제공해 드립니다. 단어를 눌러서 발음을 들어보세요.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
sticky_note_2노트 메모
학습에 필요한 나만의 메모를 남겨보세요.
tips_and_updates인덱스 핑거
현재 문장과 유사한 구조를 가지거나 보충 학습할 수 있는 예문들을 추천합니다.
원문과 유사한 fico score 및 구문 구조를 갖는 문장이 없을 경우 검색되지 않을 수 있습니다.
해당 문장에서 fico AI가 설정한 난이도 이상의 단어를 찾지 못했습니다.
듣기
상세한 구문 분석을 보고 싶은 문장을 선택하세요.
1 Impact of anonymity in online communities In September, a Pew poll showed that anonymous comments come from a quarter of people on the Internet. 2 Younger people are less likely to use their names along with a comment. 3 40% of people between the ages of 18 and 29 do not use their names. 4 The psychologist, John Suler, talks of the "online disinhibition effect" that disconnects a person's comments from himself, and online comments are often criticized for this. 5 This effect is when a lack of name means a lack of constraint on what is said. 6 Your real identity remains unknown. 7 However, a positive outcome of anonymity is that people participate more. 8 When the sense of community is stronger, the pressure of standing out as an individual is reduced. 9 In addition, creativity and problem-solving skills are increased by anonymity. 10 Ina Blau and Avner Caspi, who did research on student learning, discovered that anonymity increased participation and risk-taking while lack of anonymity improved satisfaction. 11 Moreover, anonymity brings greater regulation. 12 Lack of identity means that comments are more easily disregarded. 13 A 2012 computer interaction study confirmed the findings of the past, seeing that although anonymity brought more controversial comments, these did not tend to have much effect on anyone. 14 Michael Bernstein, a Stanford computer scientist, examined the often contentious and ill-mannered online discussion forum, 4chan, which is predominantly anonymous, and found that user interactions developed natural regulations while some commentators were, thus, considered to be of varying influence and credibility.